(The information on this site applies to Florida only)

This article was written by Scott R. McMillen and first published in the Florida Bar Journal in November, 1997.

The Overlooked Emergency Room Cause of Action
Section 395.1041, Florida Statutes 

  Part 1    Part 2    Part 3    Footnotes

Part 1

Introduction
Most Florida lawyers who handle medical malpractice cases probably have at least a general familiarity with a federal statute known as "EMTALA", which is also known as the federal "anti-dumping" statute.¹ Passed in 1986, it was initially intended to curtail the practice of hospital emergency rooms that were refusing to examine or treat indigent or uninsured patients, or that were inappropriately transferring them to other hospitals, i.e., "dumping" the patient. EMTALA requires hospitals to perform a screening examination of all patients who come to emergency rooms and if found to have a serious medical condition, they must be stabilized before discharge or transfer. It creates a private cause of action on behalf of "any individual" who suffers "personal harm" as a result of a hospital's violation of these examination and stabilization requirements.² Since its inception, plaintiffs' lawyers have had limited success using EMTALA as a remedy for what might otherwise be considered a garden variety medical malpractice claim for misdiagnosis in an emergency room.³

Apparently overlooked by the plaintiffs' bar,⁴ Florida passed its own version of EMTALA in 1988, when it enacted F.S. 395.1041.⁵ While the Florida Legislature borrowed some language from EMTALA, it also expanded the duties of emergency room health care providers and created a private cause of action that is broader in scope than the federal law. This article discusses possible uses of the remedy provisions of 395.1041, in cases where an emergency room physician inadequately examines a patient resulting in a misdiagnosis, leading to injury to the patient.


The Duty
Section 395.1041 creates many duties, the most important of which is contained in 395.1041(3)(a), which states:

"Every general hospital which has an emergency department shall provide emergency services and care for any emergency medical condition when:
1. Any person requests emergency services and care; or
2. Emergency services and care are requested on behalf
of a person by:
(a) An emergency medical services provider who is rendering care to or transporting the person; or
(b) Another hospital, when such hospital is seeking a medically necessary transfer, except as otherwise
provided in this section."

In short, if a person enters a general hospital⁶ which has an emergency department seeking medical care for an "emergency medical condition", the hospital is required to provide "emergency services and care". Hospitals are further required by the statute to ensure the provision of these services at all times, either directly, or through arrangements with one or more physicians.⁷
The terms "emergency medical condition" and "emergency services and care" are terms of art under the statute and are defined at the beginning of Chapter 395 as follows:

"395.002 Definitions. - - As used in this chapter:
(8) "Emergency medical condition" means:
(a) A medical condition manifesting itself  by acute symptoms of sufficient severity, which may include severe pain, such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in any of the following:
1. Serious jeopardy to patient health, including a pregnant woman or fetus.
2. Serious impairment to bodily functions.
3. Serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part.
(9) "Emergency services and care" means medical screening, examination, and evaluation by a physician, or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, by other appropriate personnel under the supervision of a physician, to determine if an emergency medical condition exists and, if it does, the care, treatment, or surgery by a physician necessary to relieve or eliminate the emergency medical condition, within the service capability of the facility."

The definition of an "emergency medical condition" was borrowed nearly verbatim from EMTALA,⁸ and the definition is broad enough that virtually any medical condition significant enough to be the basis of an emergency room malpractice claim should also fit under 395.1041. Certainly most emergency room malpractice claims involve allegations of either serious impairment to bodily functions or serious dysfunction of a bodily organ or part. If a claim does not have those features it probably is not economically reasonable to pursue.

The definition of the required "emergency services and care" in 395.1041 is also quite broad. While it is unclear if there is any real difference in the words "screening", "examination", and "evaluation", it is clear that "emergency services and care" has two main components; (1) an attempt at diagnosis by some type of screening or medical work-up, and (2) treatment of any existing emergency medical condition, which is broad enough to include surgery, if required.⁹

  Part 1    Part 2    Part 3    Footnotes

CLICK FOR FREE ONLINE CONSULTATION E-mail info@mcmillenlawfirm.com Call Toll Free  1-800-974-4929 Serving All of Florida ORLANDO 608 E. Central Blvd. Orlando, Florida 32801 Phone:   (407) 843-0126   TAMPA BAY 2202 North West Shore Blvd. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33607 Phone: 813-639-7644   JACKSONVILLE 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd.  Bld. 200, Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32256 Phone:   904-371-3518   MIAMI 201 South Biscayne Blvd 28th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Phone: 1-800-974-4929   WEST PALM BEACH 777 South Flagler Drive Suite 800 - West Tower West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: 1-800-974-4929 FORT LAUDERDALE 110 East Broward Blvd Suite 1700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Phone: 1-800-974-4929   SARASOTA 1990 Main Street Suite 750 Sarasota, Florida 34236 Phone: 941-309-5144   ATLANTA 3455 Peachtree Road N.E. 5th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Phone: 1-800-974-4929