![]() |
PRE-SUIT LEGISLATIVE INTENT |
![]()
(STATUTES)
Disclaimer: This is part of the 2006 version of Florida Statutes and it is offered for general information purposes. The statutes on this site should not be relied on without reviewing your legal situation with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer and making sure you are using the appropriate version of the statute for your case. The provisions applicable to your potential claim may or may not be the version that was in effect at the time of the incident because some changes to statutes are retroactive and some changes are not. Other statutes and other case law interpreting or applying these statutes may also apply to your case.
(The information on this site applies to Florida only)
766.201 Legislative findings and intent.--
(1) The Legislature makes the following findings:
(a) Medical malpractice liability insurance premiums have increased
dramatically in recent years, resulting in increased medical care costs
for most patients and functional unavailability of malpractice insurance
for some physicians.
(b) The primary cause of increased medical malpractice liability
insurance premiums has been the substantial increase in loss payments to
claimants caused by tremendous increases in the amounts of paid claims.
(c) The average cost of a medical negligence claim has escalated in the
past decade to the point where it has become imperative to control such
cost in the interests of the public need for quality medical services.
(d) The high cost of medical negligence claims in the state can be
substantially alleviated by requiring early determination of the merit
of claims, by providing for early arbitration of claims, thereby
reducing delay and attorney's fees, and by imposing reasonable
limitations on damages, while preserving the right of either party to
have its case heard by a jury.
(e) The recovery of 100 percent of economic losses constitutes
overcompensation because such recovery fails to recognize that such
awards are not subject to taxes on economic damages.
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a plan for prompt
resolution of medical negligence claims. Such plan shall consist of two
separate components, presuit investigation and arbitration. Presuit
investigation shall be mandatory and shall apply to all medical
negligence claims and defenses. Arbitration shall be voluntary and shall
be available except as specified.
(a) Presuit investigation shall include:
1. Verifiable requirements that reasonable investigation precede both
malpractice claims and defenses in order to eliminate frivolous claims
and defenses.
2. Medical corroboration procedures.
(b) Arbitration shall provide:
1. Substantial incentives for both claimants and defendants to submit
their cases to binding arbitration, thus reducing attorney's fees,
litigation costs, and delay.
2. A conditional limitation on noneconomic damages where the defendant
concedes willingness to pay economic damages and reasonable attorney's
fees.
3. Limitations on the noneconomic damages components of large awards to
provide increased predictability of outcome of the claims resolution
process for insurer anticipated losses planning, and to facilitate early
resolution of medical negligence claims.
History.--s. 48, ch. 88-1; s. 57, ch. 2003-416.
|
|
This site contains only general background information and is not intended to constitute specific legal advice or establish an attorney/client relationship. Malpractice laws vary from state to state and are constantly changing. If you think you may have a malpractice case you should promptly contact a lawyer in your state with experience in handling malpractice cases. |
|
Copyright 1997-2008 - McMillen
Law Firm * A Professional Association |
|
MALPRACTICE QUESTIONS | LOOK UP DOCTORS | DO I HAVE A GOOD CASE? | LIVING WILLS |
|
STATUTES | CASE REPORTS | NURSING HOMES | LINKS | TORT REFORM! |
|
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | HOME |