![]() |
NICA JUDGE TO DETERMINE CLAIM |
![]()
(STATUTES)
Disclaimer: This is part of the 2006 version of Florida Statutes and it is offered for general information purposes. The statutes on this site should not be relied on without reviewing your legal situation with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer and making sure you are using the appropriate version of the statute for your case. The provisions applicable to your potential claim may or may not be the version that was in effect at the time of the incident because some changes to statutes are retroactive and some changes are not. Other statutes and other case law interpreting or applying these statutes may also apply to your case.
(The information on this site applies to Florida only)
766.304 Administrative law judge to determine claims.--The
administrative law judge shall hear and determine all claims filed
pursuant to ss. 766.301-766.316 and shall exercise the full power and
authority granted to her or him in chapter 120, as necessary, to carry
out the purposes of such sections. The administrative law judge has
exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a claim filed under this act
is compensable. No civil action may be brought until the determinations
under s. 766.309 have been made by the administrative law judge. If the
administrative law judge determines that the claimant is entitled to
compensation from the association, or if the claimant accepts an award
issued under s. 766.31, no civil action may be brought or continued in
violation of the exclusiveness of remedy provisions of s.
766.303. If it
is determined that a claim filed under this act is not compensable,
neither the doctrine of collateral estoppel nor res judicata shall
prohibit the claimant from pursuing any and all civil remedies available
under common law and statutory law. The findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the administrative law judge shall not be admissible in any
subsequent proceeding; however, the sworn testimony of any person and
the exhibits introduced into evidence in the administrative case are
admissible as impeachment in any subsequent civil action only against a
party to the administrative proceeding, subject to the Rules of
Evidence. An award may not be made or paid under ss. 766.301-766.316 if
the claimant recovers under a settlement or a final judgment is entered
in a civil action. The division may adopt rules to promote the efficient
administration of, and to minimize the cost associated with, the
prosecution of claims.
History.--s. 63, ch. 88-1; s. 17, ch. 91-46; s. 3,
ch. 93-251; s. 308, ch. 96-410; s. 1803, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 98-113;
s. 90, ch. 99-3; s. 75, ch. 2003-416.
|
|
This site contains only general background information and is not intended to constitute specific legal advice or establish an attorney/client relationship. Malpractice laws vary from state to state and are constantly changing. If you think you may have a malpractice case you should promptly contact a lawyer in your state with experience in handling malpractice cases. |
|
Copyright 1997-2008 - McMillen
Law Firm * A Professional Association |
|
MALPRACTICE QUESTIONS | LOOK UP DOCTORS | DO I HAVE A GOOD CASE? | LIVING WILLS |
|
STATUTES | CASE REPORTS | NURSING HOMES | LINKS | TORT REFORM! |
|
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | HOME |