![]()
(STATUTES)
Disclaimer: This is part of the 2006 version of Florida Statutes and it is offered for general information purposes. The statutes on this site should not be relied on without reviewing your legal situation with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer and making sure you are using the appropriate version of the statute for your case. The provisions applicable to your potential claim may or may not be the version that was in effect at the time of the incident because some changes to statutes are retroactive and some changes are not. Other statutes and other case law interpreting or applying these statutes may also apply to your case.
(The information on this site applies to Florida only)
768.13 Good Samaritan Act; immunity from civil liability.--
(1) This act shall be known and cited as the "Good
Samaritan Act."
(2)(a) Any person, including those licensed to practice medicine, who
gratuitously and in good faith renders emergency care or treatment either in
direct response to emergency situations related to and arising out of a public
health emergency declared pursuant to s. 381.00315, a state of emergency which
has been declared pursuant to s. 252.36 or at the scene of an emergency outside
of a hospital, doctor's office, or other place having proper medical equipment,
without objection of the injured victim or victims thereof, shall not be held
liable for any civil damages as a result of such care or treatment or as a
result of any act or failure to act in providing or arranging further medical
treatment where the person acts as an ordinary reasonably prudent person would
have acted under the same or similar circumstances.
(b)1. Any health care provider, including a hospital licensed under chapter 395,
providing emergency services pursuant to obligations imposed by 42 U.S.C. s.
1395dd, s. 395.1041, s. 395.401, or s. 401.45 shall not be held liable for any
civil damages as a result of such medical care or treatment unless such damages
result from providing, or failing to provide, medical care or treatment under
circumstances demonstrating a reckless disregard for the consequences so as to
affect the life or health of another.
2. The immunity provided by this paragraph applies to damages as a result of any
act or omission of providing medical care or treatment, including diagnosis:
a. Which occurs prior to the time the patient is stabilized and is capable of
receiving medical treatment as a nonemergency patient, unless surgery is
required as a result of the emergency within a reasonable time after the patient
is stabilized, in which case the immunity provided by this paragraph applies to
any act or omission of providing medical care or treatment which occurs prior to
the stabilization of the patient following the surgery.
b. Which is related to the original medical emergency.
3. For purposes of this paragraph, "reckless disregard" as it applies to a given
health care provider rendering emergency medical services shall be such conduct
that a health care provider knew or should have known, at the time such services
were rendered, created an unreasonable risk of injury so as to affect the life
or health of another, and such risk was substantially greater than that which is
necessary to make the conduct negligent.
4. Every emergency care facility granted immunity under this paragraph shall
accept and treat all emergency care patients within the operational capacity of
such facility without regard to ability to pay, including patients transferred
from another emergency care facility or other health care provider pursuant to
Pub. L. No. 99-272, s. 9121. The failure of an emergency care facility to comply
with this subparagraph constitutes grounds for the department to initiate
disciplinary action against the facility pursuant to chapter 395.
(c)1. Any health care practitioner as defined in s. 456.001(4) who is in a
hospital attending to a patient of his or her practice or for business or
personal reasons unrelated to direct patient care, and who voluntarily responds
to provide care or treatment to a patient with whom at that time the
practitioner does not have a then-existing health care patient-practitioner
relationship, and when such care or treatment is necessitated by a sudden or
unexpected situation or by an occurrence that demands immediate medical
attention, shall not be held liable for any civil damages as a result of any act
or omission relative to that care or treatment, unless that care or treatment is
proven to amount to conduct that is willful and wanton and would likely result
in injury so as to affect the life or health of another.
2. The immunity provided by this paragraph does not apply to damages as a result
of any act or omission of providing medical care or treatment unrelated to the
original situation that demanded immediate medical attention.
3. For purposes of this paragraph, the Legislature's intent is to encourage
health care practitioners to provide necessary emergency care to all persons
without fear of litigation as described in this paragraph.
(d) Any person whose acts or omissions are not otherwise covered by this section
and who participates in emergency response activities under the direction of or
in connection with a community emergency response team, local emergency
management agencies, the Division of Emergency Management of the Department of
Community Affairs, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency is not liable for
any civil damages as a result of care, treatment, or services provided
gratuitously in such capacity and resulting from any act or failure to act in
such capacity in providing or arranging further care, treatment, or services, if
such person acts as a reasonably prudent person would have acted under the same
or similar circumstances.
(3) Any person, including those licensed to practice veterinary medicine, who
gratuitously and in good faith renders emergency care or treatment to an injured
animal at the scene of an emergency on or adjacent to a roadway shall not be
held liable for any civil damages as a result of such care or treatment or as a
result of any act or failure to act in providing or arranging further medical
treatment where the person acts as an ordinary reasonably prudent person would
have acted under the same or similar circumstances.
History.--ss. 1, 2, ch. 65-313; s. 1, ch. 78-334; s. 62,
ch. 86-160; s. 46, ch. 88-1; s. 4, ch. 88-173; s. 42, ch. 88-277; s. 1, ch.
89-71; s. 37, ch. 91-110; s. 33, ch. 93-211; s. 3, ch. 97-34; s. 1164, ch.
97-102; s. 2, ch. 2001-76; s. 3, ch. 2002-269; s. 65, ch. 2003-416; s. 1, ch.
2004-45.
|
|
This site contains only general background information and is not intended to constitute specific legal advice or establish an attorney/client relationship. Malpractice laws vary from state to state and are constantly changing. If you think you may have a malpractice case you should promptly contact a lawyer in your state with experience in handling malpractice cases. |
|
Copyright 1997-2006 - McMillen
Law Firm * A Professional Association |
|
MALPRACTICE QUESTIONS | LOOK UP DOCTORS | DO I HAVE A GOOD CASE? | LIVING WILLS |
|
STATUTES | CASE REPORTS | NURSING HOMES | LINKS | TORT REFORM! |
|
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | HOME |